Schools as Spaces of Gender Socialization: Reinforcing or Challenging Norms?

Schools are often described as great equalisers, places where children of all backgrounds gain the skills to shape their futures. Yet, look closely at any classroom, playground, or staff room, and a quieter curriculum reveals itself, one that teaches children what it means to be a “boy” or a “girl”. From seating arrangements to subject choices, schools play a powerful role in shaping how young people understand gender, sometimes reinforcing rigid norms and sometimes pushing against them.

The hidden curriculum of gender
Gendered school environments: infrastructure and access
The sanitation gap
Female teachers as role models
Gender bias in classroom practices
Teacher attitudes and expectations
Curriculum and textbook content
Peer dynamics and the playground
Educational experiences and choices
Subject choices and the STEM gap
Career aspirations and gendered futures
Can schools challenge norms instead of reinforcing them?

The hidden curriculum of gender

Sociologists describe schools as one of the most influential agents of gender socialisation, the process by which children internalise the roles, behaviours, and expectations associated with their assigned gender. While the formal curriculum focuses on academics, a parallel “hidden curriculum” operates through daily routines, teacher expectations, peer interactions, and the very design of school spaces. As researchers studying classroom practice note, gender is produced and reproduced through everyday social interactions within institutions that organise time, space, authority, and recognition in ways that appear entirely natural to students and adults.

This means that even when a curriculum is officially gender-neutral, the school environment may not be. A child learns gender from where they sit, who they line up with, what games they are allowed to play, and which behaviours earn praise or reprimand.

Gendered school environments: infrastructure and access

Before we discuss what happens inside the classroom, we must consider whether girls can even reach and remain in school. Physical infrastructure plays a decisive role in determining who stays and who drops out.

The sanitation gap

One of the most pressing infrastructural issues for girls’ education is the availability of clean, private, and functional toilets. A recent NITI Aayog report flagged that 98,592 schools do not have functional toilets for girls, while 61,540 schools lack any usable toilet facility. Experts have repeatedly warned that inadequate sanitation directly affects girls’ attendance and pushes up dropout risks during adolescence.

The problem intensifies at puberty. When menstruation begins, the absence of safe toilets, water, and disposal facilities becomes a real barrier. Studies show that school enrolment and dropout, especially of girls, is influenced by multiple factors, with WASH (water, sanitation, and hygiene) infrastructure being a critical one. International guidelines recommend one toilet per 25 girl students, a standard many Indian schools still struggle to meet, particularly in rural areas.

Female teachers as role models

The presence, or absence, of female teachers also shapes the school experience for girls. Parents in many communities feel more comfortable sending daughters to schools staffed by women, especially at the secondary level. Beyond safety, female teachers serve as visible role models. Research on counter-stereotypical role models shows that exposure to female educators, particularly in subjects like science and maths, can increase girls’ interest in STEM through enhancing their feelings of compatibility and altering their beliefs about what they can achieve.

However, female representation thins out at higher academic levels and in leadership positions like principals, sending an implicit message about who holds authority in education.

Gender bias in classroom practices

Once children enter the classroom, gender continues to shape their experience in subtle but consistent ways. Teacher attitudes, curriculum content, and peer dynamics all contribute to what students learn about their place in the world.

Teacher attitudes and expectations

Teachers often hold gendered expectations of children without realising it. A Brookings analysis of early childhood education in India found that preschool teachers stated that boys are generally naughtier than girls in the classroom; though they could not say why, they insisted this held true for all children they taught. When children parroted gender stereotypical roles they witnessed at home, teachers accepted them without question.

Research on Delhi preschools highlighted another telling pattern. Observers noticed that every time girls would not be sitting properly, the teacher would constantly be reprimanding them, saying ‘sit properly’. Boys, by contrast, faced fewer such corrections. Over time, these everyday corrections shape how girls move, speak, and occupy space, while boys are given more latitude to be loud, assertive, or “naughty”.

Spatial arrangements such as separate lines, separate seating, and gender-divided activities also reinforce the idea that boys and girls are fundamentally different and should not mix freely.

Curriculum and textbook content

Textbooks are not neutral. They are some of the first formal sources from which children learn about the world, and what they show, or fail to show, matters. An analysis by the Center for Global Development found that South Asia, and India in particular, is the worst region in the English-speaking world for stereotypes and low representation of women and girls in schoolbooks. Indian textbooks tend to link mothers strongly with cooking and home, while doctors, scientists, and leaders are routinely depicted as male.

A separate study analysing NCERT senior secondary political science textbooks found “overtly gendered representations” and called for greater feminist critique of mainstream disciplinary knowledge. Visual content tells a similar story: women are often shown in domestic settings, while men appear in public, professional, and decision-making roles. Such patterns subtly tell girls where they belong and where they do not.

Peer dynamics and the playground

Children also socialise each other. Playgrounds and break times often reveal sharp gender divides: boys claim large outdoor spaces for cricket or football, while girls cluster on the edges. Teaching materials from teacher education courses point out everyday patterns like the majority of girls constituting the assembly choir group and the boys forming the inter-school cricket team, with seating, activities, and roles distributed along gendered lines.

Peer teasing can be particularly damaging. Boys who show interest in dance, art, or “feminine” subjects often face ridicule, while girls who excel in mathematics or sports may be labelled “too aggressive”. These social costs push children to conform, even when their interests pull them elsewhere.

Educational experiences and choices

The cumulative effect of these messages shows up most clearly in the choices students make as they move toward higher education and careers.

Subject choices and the STEM gap

Despite girls performing as well as or better than boys in school-level science and mathematics, fewer continue into STEM streams. As one analysis of the global gender gap in STEM notes, widespread beliefs that science and math are “for boys” discourage girls from pursuing STEM, while parents and teachers may subconsciously steer girls toward traditionally “feminine” fields. This is what researchers call the “leaky pipeline”, where women drop out at every successive stage of the STEM journey.

Studies of secondary-school students show that girls are more likely to narrow their occupational choices because they perceive particular occupations as inappropriate for their gender. Even when ability is identical, perception drives choice. A girl who consistently sees male scientists in her textbooks and rarely meets a female engineer may simply not picture herself in that role.

Career aspirations and gendered futures

Career aspirations follow the same patterns. Boys are nudged toward engineering, business, and the armed forces; girls toward teaching, nursing, and the humanities. These choices are not neutral expressions of interest. They emerge from years of subtle steering by teachers, parents, peers, and media. Research on adolescent identity in India suggests, however, that adolescent girls are determined to change their identities as they do not want to limit themselves within four walls, signalling that awareness is growing and that change is possible.

Can schools challenge norms instead of reinforcing them?

The good news is that schools are not destined to be sites of inequality. Targeted interventions have shown real promise. A well-known evaluation in Haryana studied a school-based programme of interactive classroom discussions about gender roles and discrimination among adolescents, which made participants more supportive of gender equality, with effects persisting two years after the programme ended.

Other promising shifts include gender-sensitive teacher training, redesigning textbooks to feature women in diverse professional roles, building safe and well-maintained toilets, recruiting more female teachers in science and maths, and creating mixed-gender activities that break down playground divides. The National Education Policy 2020 has emphasised gender equity and is now driving textbook revisions to address some of these gaps.

Schools, in the end, mirror society. But they can also be one of the few institutions where children encounter different possibilities, see counter-stereotypical role models, and learn to question what they have been told about themselves. Whether a school reinforces or challenges norms depends less on policy documents and more on what teachers, principals, and peers do every single day.

What do you think? Looking back at your own schooling, can you recall moments when teachers, textbooks, or classmates treated boys and girls differently? Did those experiences shape the subjects you chose or the career you now aspire to?

References

PDF 📄

Schools as Spaces of Gender Socialization: Reinforcing or Challenging Norms?

Table of Contents

The hidden curriculum of gender 🔗

Gendered school environments: infrastructure and access 🔗

The sanitation gap 🔗

Female teachers as role models 🔗

Gender bias in classroom practices 🔗

Teacher attitudes and expectations 🔗

Curriculum and textbook content 🔗

Peer dynamics and the playground 🔗

Educational experiences and choices 🔗

Subject choices and the STEM gap 🔗

Career aspirations and gendered futures 🔗

Can schools challenge norms instead of reinforcing them? 🔗