Living the Female Body: How Gender Shapes Women’s Experiences

A woman’s body is rarely just a body. From the dolls placed in her hands as a toddler to the bindi expected on her forehead as a bride, every stage of a woman’s life is marked by social signals that tell her how to occupy her own skin. This is what feminist scholars call embodiment-the lived experience of inhabiting a body that is constantly being interpreted, regulated and ritualised by the society around it. To understand how gender shapes women’s lives, we need to look closely at what it actually feels like to live inside a female body across the life course.

What does “living the female body” mean? 🔗

The phrase comes from feminist phenomenology, a branch of philosophy that argues the body is not just a biological object but a site of experience shaped by culture. Simone de Beauvoir’s famous claim that “one is not born, but rather becomes, a woman” captures this beautifully. Biology gives us breasts, uteruses and menstrual cycles, but society decides what those features mean, who gets to touch them, and how a woman should carry them through the world.

For girls and women, this often means learning to see the body from the outside in-as something to be groomed, covered, displayed, controlled or sacrificed for the sake of others. The body becomes both intimately one’s own and strangely public, a contradiction that shapes everything from how a girl sits at a school desk to how a widow is treated at a funeral.

Childhood and the gendered body 🔗

Long before a girl can articulate what gender is, her body is already being trained. Beauvoir observed in The Second Sex that girls are encouraged from infancy to treat their bodies as passive objects of display rather than active instruments of exploration. While boys are pushed to climb, fight, and “dominate nature” with their limbs, girls are taught through dolls, compliments on appearance, and warnings about danger to be passive, to beautify the body, and to fear the world.

This early socialisation creates what Beauvoir called the situation of being made “the Other”-a being defined in relation to the male subject rather than as a subject in her own right. In Indian households, the patterns are familiar: girls are told to sit with their knees together, to lower their voices, to not run too fast, to help in the kitchen while brothers play outside. None of these instructions are explicitly about gender, yet together they teach a girl that her body is to be managed, watched and made pleasing.

The doll, the mirror and the male gaze 🔗

Beauvoir’s example of the doll is particularly striking. By giving girls dolls to dress, comb and care for, society teaches them very early to see themselves as objects to be looked at-pretty, decorated and well-behaved. The mirror becomes a tool of self-surveillance. By the time a girl is eight or nine, she has often internalised an outside perspective on her own body, constantly checking how she appears to others. This is the foundation of what John Berger later called seeing oneself being seen.

Adolescence: the sexual body arrives 🔗

If childhood teaches a girl to manage her body, adolescence transforms it overnight into something she barely recognises. Breasts develop, hips widen, and somewhere between the ages of eleven and fifteen, menstruation begins. Suddenly, the body is no longer a child’s body-it is read as a sexual body, and the rules change dramatically.

Menarche: a celebration and a confinement 🔗

The first period, or menarche, is one of the most culturally loaded moments in a woman’s life. In South India, it is often marked with elaborate celebration. The Ritu Kala Samskaram, also called the half-saree function, is a rite of passage performed after a girl’s first menstruation, where she is gifted a half-sari by her maternal uncle and family to mark her transition into womanhood. Relatives gather, gifts are exchanged, and the girl is publicly recognised as having entered a new phase of life.

Yet the same biological event that is celebrated in Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka is treated very differently elsewhere. In parts of central and north India, menstruating girls and women face restrictive taboos such as being denied entry to the kitchen or to places of worship. The contradiction is striking: the same blood that “purifies” a girl into womanhood in one region is treated as “polluting” in another.

The silence and the shame 🔗

For most Indian girls, menarche arrives without warning. A study in rural Tamil Nadu found that 84% of girls were unaware of what was happening to them at the time of their first period, and mothers rarely talk to their daughters about menstruation in advance. Fear, panic and confusion are the most common first reactions.

What follows is a quiet but powerful reconfiguration of how a girl inhabits her body. Sociocultural codes after menarche cultivate rigid gender roles and stigmatising practices-including isolation, restrictions on participating in daily activities, sleeping on separate mats, being banned from the puja room, and using separate utensils. She learns to hide her sanitary pad inside a newspaper, to whisper about cramps, to skip temple visits, and to feel a vague shame about a function that is entirely natural.

This shame has real consequences. After attaining menarche, around 23% of girls drop out of school, citing lack of toilets, fear of staining, and social restrictions as primary reasons. The body that should be a vehicle for learning and play becomes an obstacle to it.

The double message of puberty 🔗

Adolescence sends girls a contradictory message. On one hand, the body is now “ready”-for marriage, for motherhood, for adult femininity. On the other hand, it must be hidden, monitored and protected. Once girls reach puberty they are closely monitored, while boys of the same age learn to be free; menarche is often considered the end of childhood for girls in India. Mobility shrinks, dress codes tighten, and the girl who once cycled to school may suddenly be told to take an auto-rickshaw instead.

Marriage and the marked body 🔗

If menarche introduces the sexual body, marriage formalises it. The Indian wedding is an extraordinary set of rituals that quite literally marks the bride’s body-with henna, sindoor, mangalsutra, toe rings, bangles, and a new draping of the saree. Each of these adornments serves a social purpose: to announce her changed status to the world.

The solah shringar, or sixteen adornments of a married Hindu woman, symbolise her married status and her allure for her husband, and not wearing them invites social censure from family or society. Crucially, the husband typically wears no such markers. The asymmetry is the point: it is the woman’s body, not the man’s, that must visibly carry the marriage.

Patrilocal residence amplifies this embodied transition. In India’s largely patrilocal society, women move from their natal household to their marital household, losing ties with their natal kin and entering a new environment where they hold subordinate status to both men and senior women, particularly the mother-in-law. The body that learned one home’s rhythms must now relearn another’s-different food, different temple, different bedtime, different expectations about how to dress, walk and speak.

The wife’s body as territory 🔗

Feminist scholars have long noted that marital adornments function almost like territorial markers. The body becomes a kind of public document declaring that this woman is “taken”, protected, and obligated. Rituals such as Karva Chauth, in which the woman fasts and worships her husband as “Patiparmeshwar” praying for his long life, reinforce the idea that the wife’s primary duty is subservience and loyalty to the husband and his family. The wife’s body literally goes hungry for the husband’s longevity.

Motherhood: the celebrated and controlled body 🔗

If marriage marks the body, motherhood sanctifies it-at least in theory. India’s cultural imagination places mothers on a near-divine pedestal, captured in the phrase Matru Devo Bhava, “the mother is a goddess.” Yet this glorification often coexists with severe control over the actual reproductive choices of real women.

Brahminical ideology created a system that elevated motherhood symbolically while controlling women materially-women were valued primarily for their reproductive capacity, particularly for producing sons. The pregnant body is celebrated with rituals like godh bharai and seemantham, yet the same body may be pressured into sex-selective practices, denied autonomy over contraception, or scrutinised for “failing” to deliver a boy.

Pregnancy and childbirth also bring an intense medicalisation of the body. Diet, movement, sleep and emotions are all monitored by elders, doctors and tradition simultaneously. The woman’s body becomes, in a very real sense, a shared resource-everyone has an opinion about it, and her own preferences are often the last to be consulted.

Menopause: freedom, distress, or both? 🔗

If menstruation announces fertility, menopause ends it-and how this ending is experienced depends enormously on culture. Western biomedical discourse often frames menopause as a deficiency, a loss, even a disease to be treated with hormone replacement therapy. Indian women, by contrast, often describe it in surprisingly mixed but frequently positive terms.

A qualitative study of menopausal women in Haryana identified three dominant narratives: menopause as a normal biological process, menopause as distress arising from the intersection of poverty, gender and patriarchy, and menopause as freedom from societal restrictions and monthly difficulties. The same women often moved between all three.

The “freedom” narrative is particularly revealing. For women who have spent decades managing the cultural baggage of menstruation-isolation during periods, restrictions on temple entry, the constant management of “polluting” blood-menopause can feel like release. Family-centric Indian women often perceive menopause as a natural progression with relatively minor symptoms and welcome a life free from fear of pregnancy and the inconvenience of menses. The post-menopausal woman often gains social authority, takes on the role of mother-in-law, and is finally permitted into ritual spaces that were closed to her during her reproductive years.

But the picture is not uniformly rosy. Older women may also experience a loss of attention, intimacy and even economic security. The body that was once celebrated as fertile is now sometimes dismissed as “finished”. Gendered embodiment, in other words, does not end with menopause-it simply enters a new phase.

Why this matters 🔗

Tracing a woman’s life through her body-childhood, adolescence, marriage, motherhood, menopause-reveals that gender is not an abstract identity layered on top of biology. It is a daily, physical experience of being trained, watched, marked, celebrated and restricted. Understanding embodiment helps explain why issues like menstrual leave, maternity care, body image and reproductive rights are not just policy questions but deeply personal ones about who gets to inhabit their own body on their own terms.

It also helps us see why change is slow. Rituals and restrictions that have shaped female bodies for generations cannot be dismantled by laws alone. They live in mothers teaching daughters how to sit, in grandmothers warning about temple entry, in advertisements selling fairness creams, and in the silence around a teenager’s first period. Changing the experience of living the female body means changing all of these at once.

What do you think? Looking back at your own life or those of the women around you, which moments do you think most strongly shaped how a woman is taught to relate to her body? And do you think India’s recent conversations around menstruation and consent are genuinely shifting the way younger women inhabit their bodies, or only changing the surface?

References

1. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/beauvoir/
2. https://www.rewriting-the-rules.com/gender/international-womens-day/
3. https://the-philosophers-shirt.com/blogs/philosophical-dictionary/objectification-simone-de-beauvoirs-feminist-idea
4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ritu_Kala_Samskaram
5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_and_menstruation
6. https://gppreview.com/2020/07/08/breaking-the-silence-taboos-and-social-stigma-surrounding-menstruation-in-rural-india/
7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7682741/
8. https://scholars.direct/Articles/anthropology/iap-2-011.php?jid=anthropology
9. https://feminisminindia.com/2021/04/20/how-do-marital-adornments-impact-womens-lives/
10. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10538655/
11. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3705690/
12. https://gender.study/gender-sensitization/mother-india-cultural-symbolism-motherhood/
13. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK565663/
14. https://aijournals.com/index.php/ajmr/article/view/135